The program does not replace the Epple committees or bioethics review process. Rather, the program provides public patient representatives (PPRs) should the resident meet the criteria to have one assigned as required by Health and Safety Code (HSC) § 1418.8.
HSC § 1418.8 requires a facility to conduct an interdisciplinary team (IDT) review of a proposed or prescribed medical intervention that requires informed consent prior to its administration when -
- The resident’s attending physician has determined that the resident lacks capacity to give the informed consent, and
- The resident does not have a legal decision maker.
This IDT review has also been referred to as an Epple Committee meeting, bioethics review process, or an unrepresented patient IDT. As of January 27, 2023, an IDT review convened pursuant to HSC § 1418.8 must include a patient representative in addition to the attending physician, a registered nurse responsible for the resident’s care, and any other appropriate staff. The patient representative may be a resident’s family member or friend who is not able to take full responsibility for making health care decisions for the resident but is willing and available to participate in the IDT review.
If the resident does not have a family member or friend who is willing and available to serve as the patient representative, the facility must submit a request for a PPR to the California Patient Representative Information System. Upon receipt of the request, the Office of the Long-Term Care Patient Representative will assign a PPR to participate in the IDT review convened pursuant to HSC § 1418.8.
The IDT review may be held in person or remotely, but all required IDT members must be present. Facilities must provide a number of notices related to IDT reviews. Facilities may not implement medical interventions authorized by an IDT prior to providing notice to the resident and the resident’s patient representative regarding the outcome of the IDT review. The notice must state that the resident has a right to judicial review, and the facility must allow sufficient time for the resident to seek judicial review prior to implementing a medical intervention.
If the resident chooses to seek judicial review, the facility may not implement any medical interventions authorized by the IDT prior to the court making a final determination—except in emergencies.